หมวดหมู่ของบทความนี้จะเกี่ยวกับmotor power grade คือ หากคุณกำลังมองหาmotor power grade คือมาถอดรหัสหัวข้อmotor power grade คือกับBirthYouInLoveในโพสต์Why there’s more to come in the Mercedes F1 rear wing controversyนี้.
สารบัญ
สังเคราะห์เนื้อหาที่เกี่ยวข้องmotor power grade คือที่ถูกต้องที่สุดในWhy there’s more to come in the Mercedes F1 rear wing controversy
ที่เว็บไซต์Birth You In Loveคุณสามารถอัปเดตข้อมูลอื่น ๆ นอกเหนือจากmotor power grade คือได้รับความรู้ที่มีคุณค่ามากขึ้นสำหรับคุณ ที่เว็บไซต์birthyouinlove.com เราอัปเดตข้อมูลใหม่และถูกต้องให้คุณทุกวัน, ด้วยความหวังที่จะให้บริการข่าวที่สมบูรณ์ที่สุดสำหรับคุณ ช่วยให้ผู้ใช้เพิ่มข้อมูลบนอินเทอร์เน็ตในวิธีที่เร็วที่สุด.
คำอธิบายบางส่วนที่เกี่ยวข้องกับหมวดหมู่motor power grade คือ
ปีกหลัง F1 ของ Mercedes เป็นหนึ่งในประเด็นสำคัญของการแข่งขัน Brazilian Grand Prix ในช่วงสุดสัปดาห์ แต่ด้วยเหตุผลสองประการที่แตกต่างกัน ในขณะที่การตัดสิทธิ์ของ Lewis Hamilton จากรอบคัดเลือกในวันศุกร์กลายเป็นหัวข้อข่าว การตรวจสอบรถของคู่แข่งใน Parc ferme ที่อยากรู้อยากเห็นของ Max Verstappen นั้นแท้จริงแล้วได้รับแรงบันดาลใจจาก Red Bull ที่น่าสงสัย ในวิดีโอนี้ เราอธิบายว่าทำไมสิ่งที่ Verstappen พบอาจนำไปสู่บทละครในเรื่องนี้มากขึ้นก่อนสิ้นสุดฤดูกาล #F1 #Mercedes #LewisHamilton อ่านเพิ่มเติมที่นี่ สมัครสมาชิก: เว็บไซต์: Twitter: @wearetherace Instagram: @wearetherace Facebook: Podcasts: ขอบคุณที่รับชม – โปรดกดไลค์ แชร์ และแสดงความคิดเห็น โปรดกดสมัครรับข้อมูลเพื่อแสดงการสนับสนุนของคุณ เราจะทำต่อไป สิ่งที่เรากำลังทำ .
ภาพถ่ายบางส่วนที่เกี่ยวข้องกับหัวข้อของmotor power grade คือ
นอกจากการดูข้อมูลเกี่ยวกับบทความนี้แล้ว Why there’s more to come in the Mercedes F1 rear wing controversy สามารถดูและอ่านข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมได้ที่ด้านล่าง
คลิกที่นี่เพื่อดูข้อมูลใหม่เพิ่มเติม
ข้อเสนอแนะบางประการเกี่ยวกับmotor power grade คือ
#Mercedes #rear #wing #controversy.
f1,formula 1,formula one,F1 2021,F1 news,F1 latest,F1 updates,F1 explained,The Race,the-race.com,grand prix,Mercedes,Lewis Hamilton,Max Verstappen,red bull,rear wing,Mercedes rear wing,Brazilian Grand Prix,Brazil F1,Sao Paulo Grand Prix,Why was Lewis Hamilton disqualified in Brazil?,Toto Wolff,Christian Horner,Verstappen Mercedes rear wing,Verstappen touch mercedes parc ferme,Why did Verstappen get fined in Brazil F1?.
Why there’s more to come in the Mercedes F1 rear wing controversy.
motor power grade คือ.
หวังว่าค่านิยมบางอย่างที่เรามอบให้จะเป็นประโยชน์กับคุณ ขอบคุณมากสำหรับการอ่านmotor power grade คือข่าวของเรา
Spin Doctor Much?
Where in the FIA Technical Delegates Reports does it state that The DRS wing "Only Failed on the Right hand side" ???
Going by the report and the argument put forward by mercedes at the time the wing "passed at the center (near actuator) but failed tests on the outer sections (side plate pivots) .
And where does it make reference to "only failing by .02mm" or any measured amount the wing was said to have failed by??? The (DRS Opening) Test, conducted with specific Gauge as per procedure stipulated in provided Technical Directive Only provides Pass or Fail Results, It doesn't provide the amount Measured to have failed by!!! Teams are provided with the gauge and technical directive, It's THE TEAMS responsibility to CORRECTLY ASSEMBLE and Test the Wing to ensure they present a car that Complies with regulation, (As they had competently managed to do in in previous races in the season)!
It's The FIA's Technical Delegates Responsibility to Ensure Teams are Complying with Regulations!
If Mercedes feel hard done by for not been given the opportunity to rectify the issue, …… Then They Should have Rectified the Issue before having Competed and well before any Post Session Scrutineering,!
,IDEALY in Session P1 WHEN the already Obvious Performance Gains (from their "Failure" ) would have been identified and clearly evident with Telemetry Analysis!
Still Stewards excepted the explanation put forward by Mercedes that it was "Something Gone Wrong", Stewards Adding "It was clear to the Stewards that the additional deflection was due to additional play either in the DRS actuator or the pivots at the end, or some combination or other fault with the
mechanism, OR INCORRECT ASSEMBLY of the parts",
But all That said, I did find one comment in this story felt was accurate,> "It Likely failed the test because of A FAILURE!" NOT WRONG!> Failure to manufacture/assemble Correctly! Failure To Test DRS wing Assembly!,- Failure to Comply with regulations!
i hope this gets into drive to survive
this investigation needs to be revisited…
Max has done this maneuver more often than i can count. If he is in danger of loosing position or wants to pull an overtaking he purposely broke to late and rather takes the risk of a crash!
Never gets a penalty for dangerous driving and when he gets one it is of no cosequence.
They got the stewards in they'r pocket and complain FIA is always against them wich we could see at the final race 2021!
More to come?
3 weeks later and nothing jas come of it.
RedBull did spread BS, didn't they?
Oh well.
I think it is weird that Bottas took a number of laps and Tot Wolf had even to encourage/force Bottas to start overtaking before he started to move up positions. Could it be that Bottas knew that Mercs had some illegal advantage that he wouldn't be part of unless being forced – to make a statement?
Can I ask about Red Bull.s flapping top element of the rear wing when the DRS was open. Surely if Mercedes get disqualified for 0.2mm shouldn’t there also be a test by the FIA scrutinisers look into Red Bulls rear wing and have a load test when the DRS is open. As it’s getting a bit farcical that the last 4 races Red Bull have been patching up their rear wing 3 times in Parc Ferme, it was a breath of fresh air to see them working on the rear wings during free practice. There are 18 other cars that don’t seem to have to do what Red Bull are doing. They want Mercedes rear wing looking at. Maybe that should sort their own rear wing out first.
The evidence was tampered with when Verstappen put his hands on the wing.
It’s because Ham is black that’s why
Bullshit
6:39 You're sponsored by the Saudi Arabian government? …Unsubscribed.
"just bad luck" sure jan 🙂
OMG give Red Bull a Dummy, MAX in my view is a dirty driver.
Lewis Hamilton…F1's first female driver
Ffs. Rear wing this, rear wing that. It's a rear wing. It looks fine. Sometimes in a race, a car is faster than another car. Deal with it. The combination of Lewis and that Merc is the advantage.
Bru if hamilton was in Max's position all orang army would have said it's maFIA. Now what huh
Maybe examine the part's composition to see what it's made of and how it behaves under different temperatures? Mercedes' access to resources are unparalleled.
"Let them race"?? What do they call putting Hamilton at the back then? 'Let Verstappen race'?
I wish you wouldn't waste so much time in every episode complaining about subscribers. People will either subscribe or they won't, I doubt you'll convince anyone
That Mercedes wing is definitely flexing under load. The score marks show that and I think it failed a little when they used it hence it failed the tests. Along with Mercedes bending regs for the engine and using 5 so far with a sixth on the plans, the lower teams have started complaining about that stating they cannot use 6 engines in a season! It's meant to be 3 engines with allowance for more only if you need it due to failure, not to beat your rivals to win the championship! It makes a complete mockery of the rules.
These mfs know if Lewis won’t win this year’s title he’ll never win it again
Just like Michael Schumacher
So they changed his engine wing and even suspension
That’s so fucked up and they are still allowed to race
Especially when the car is much more different than bottas’s car that seems sus af
Don't care one way of the other…BUT, there is absolutely no way Red Bull could have known about this condition without being told about it.
I think nobody can’t deny that FIA plays a dirty rol in the championship……….. and Merc has an illegal car…
Michael Masi is being paid off by helmet of course.